@article {ref_10072, title = {Archiefwet? Informatiewet!}, year = {2016}, note = {

Bevat een tabel met een overzicht van mogelijke vormen van communicatie / interactie / uitwisseling

Proces zender (contex) Proces ontvanger (context)

Berichten zenden

  • geauthenticeerde gelijkluidende kopie
  • eigen bewaartermijn

Berichten ontvangen

  • te gebruiken origineel
  • eigen bewaartermijn

Informatie publiceren

  • beschrikbaarstellen
  • beschikbaar houden tot ...
  • eigen bewaartermijn

Informatie halen

  • raadplegen
  • downloaden en opnemen
  • eigen bewaartermijn

Informatie overdragen

  • {\textquoteright}knippen{\textquoteright}
  • documenteren

Informatie opnemen

  • {\textquoteright}plakken{\textquoteright}
  • documenteren

}, month = {11/2016}, pages = {17}, address = {Leeuwarden}, abstract = {

Presentatie als basis voor een interview over Archiefwet 1995 voor het Platform Keteninformatisering van 15 november 2016.

}, keywords = {archief, archiveren, bewaarbelang, communicatie, informatie, keteninformatisering, ontvangen, uitwisselbaarheid, zenden}, author = {Rienk Jonker} } @article {ref_10079, title = {Information - A conceptual labyrinth}, year = {2016}, note = {

Presentatie voor het DLM Forum dat op 8 en 9 juni 2016 werd gehouden in Den Haag (Nationaal Archief)

De inhoud van deze presentatie is verwerkt in mijn bijdrage aan het S@P Jaarboek 17 Archives in Liquid Times[bib]ref_10155[/bib],\ A perfect match? Connecting partners in the labyrinth of information[bib]ref_10134[/bib].

In deze presentattie heb ik ook een poging gedaan de relaties via {\textquoteright}stellingen{\textquoteright} weer te geven (sheet 4).\ 

De stellingenSI = Semantic information met

- de objecten:

- kwaliteiten

De R staat voor Record,\ 

Het geheel is dan te lezen als\ 

Voor het begrip semantische informatie mag ook de samenstelling emantisch kapiltaalgoed gebruikt worden. [bib]ref_10240[/bib]

}, month = {06/2016}, address = {Leeuwarden}, abstract = {

The world of information has all the characteristics of a chaotic complex system with lots of turbulence. In no way it is comparable with the static paper environment. Nothing remains everything changes, something we actually have to accept as quite normal.
We as archivists are in this fluid digital world looking for fixation points, we want to be able to fixate some moments. But to fix, it must be clear why something has to be fixed, what content is to be fixed and eventually how this fixation technically is to be carried out.
Our field, the archival science, has at its disposal a broad variety of fundamental pillars. To begin with of course, the Manual for the Arrangement and Description of Archives (De Handleiding). This work still contains components and concepts that are still in modern times very useful. This work has been during the years complemented by a number of useful standards from ICA, ISO, and even the European Union. Not to forget the results of the international research of InterPares.
The intention of these works is to provide the professional archivist or records manager guidance through the maze or the labyrinth of information concepts and information systems. But is this assumption right or we missing something? If there is already enough guidance why is it that there are there still so many questions asked, why is there so much not cleared.
Therefore current concepts and models with derived terms and definitions are insufficient for the approach of the current changes. A lot of those approaches are often accrued from a very persistent "paper mind set".
A phenomenon and heritage which permeates our culture. A legacy one can describe as the paper paradigm. A phenomenon that leads actually to the {\textquoteleft}paperization{\textquoteright} of the perception of the digital environments. This confusion must be put aside. Otherwise, we will continue to drive forward at full speed only relying on the rearview mirrors while the windshield is still blinded. Therefore a fundamental reinvention and redefinition of our professional paradigms is a prerequisite.\ 
On the other hand the archivist / records manager has as practitioner to travel on the moving high speed train. At the same time he has to find his way in the design departments, the construction sites, the maintenance sites and the boardroom table. This is only possible when his message is unambiguously and clear. To be able to do that he needs {\textquoteright}simple{\textquoteright} information model with instruments that meets the following requirements, it is generic, easy to handle and it is constant.\ 

In recent years I have as a result of my work as archivist particularly from the viewpoint of the practice thought a lot about the possibility to come up with a foothold in this wonderful world of information management.
I noted that my answers and advices were more and more based on an implicit information model, which consists of a core or a kind of constant undercurrent.\ 
This model has a number of invariant constant elements where information has qualities like meaningful, well-formed and trustworthy. It represents information in a continuum of time and space as the only constant factor at its centre. These qualities are also the essential composing parts of a record. \ Furthermore there is a relation with the information model and the explanation of semantic information described by the information philosopher Luciano Floridi .\ 

Just three entities are the essence of the model. First of all to be meaningful the information has to be provided with context (1), to be well formed the information has to be contained in an information object (2). For information to come into existence there has to be an event or transaction (3). Part of an event or transaction are different ways of communication. In this model \ trustworthiness and veracity are derived qualities.\ 

This information model is so far crystallized that it is possible to give an insight that covers the answer to this question:

Is it possible to develop an information model including a model for sharing and exchange of information (records) independent of social, organizational and technical changes and at the same time compliant to the required qualities and retention interests?

The process of filling up a car with fuel will be used as example for presentation and discussion.

}, url = {http://www.dlmforum.eu/index.php/component/jdownloads/summary/75-session-i/362-information-is-a-conceptual-labyrinth-rienk-jonker}, author = {Rienk Jonker} } @article {ref_10134, title = {A perfect match? Connecting partners in the labyrinth of information}, year = {2017}, note = {

In: Frans Smit, Arnoud Glaudemans and Rienk Jonker, Archives in liquid times, Stichting Archiefpublicaties, {\textquoteright}s Gravenhage, 2017. (p 78-91)

Full text here / Volledige tekst hier

}, month = {12/2017}, pages = {19}, publisher = {Stichting Archiefpublicaties}, address = {{\textquoteright}s Gravenhage}, abstract = {

In this essay I will give some insight about the results of my quest as archivist\  to understand the fundamentals of information. It is about trying not only to understand the complexity, but most and for all to grasp or grock this phenomenon. With the verb grock one indicates that he or she is to understand completely and thoroughly an object, subject or issue (Heinlein 1961). At some point it was for me a surprise to notice that the common perception of complexity of information and information management overshadows the relative simplicity of the outcome of the grocking.
As a result of this journey I was able to develop a basic information model or framework that consists at its core only of three basic interconnected elements. Each element has its own characteristics. An information model is for me a somewhat formal abstract description of objects, attributes, relationships, and rules in a particular domain. It was for me a feasible answer to questions about the possibility to come up with an information model including a model for sharing and exchange of information independent of social, organizational and technical changes and at the same time a model compliant to the required qualities and retention interests. This model I call defiantly the Leeuwarder Information Model (LIM) because there it came eventually to existence. Although it is a kind of archival information model I found it somewhat insolent to call it so. There are indeed enough other archival information models around.
Despite the organizational or cultural background of actors and despite what technical instruments are used for processing information there is always a consistent undercurrent. An undercurrent from the viewpoint of information as a constant factor with basic interwoven notions or concepts as context, documents or more neutral information objects, activities, communication or exchange and particularly also notions about their mutual dependencies.
The sum of these three elements can be called meaningful information (MI). These three elements also determine whether or not a set of meaningful information makes up an archival record. Information is considered a record when it can be used in a personal or organizational context as evidence of a transaction, for reasons of compliancy, conformancy and governance. It is mostly about administrative, legal, fiscal values. As a rule one can say a record is always meaningful information, but not all meaningful information is record. Meaningful information is only a record because we want it to be a record. One could say a record is a construct that lies in the eyes of the beholder. But to avoid further distraction this essay is not about the definition of records and recordness. That is a discussion that has to take place elsewhere.
A real surprise was to observe that essential parts of my notion of meaningful information could be annex to the concept of semantic information (SI) of Floridi (2010). A discovery I found worthwhile to look further into.

}, keywords = {communictie, context, ImArch, ImRec, informatie-object, informatiemodel, ontvangen, philosophy of information, semantic information, zenden}, author = {Rienk Jonker} } @article {ref_1458, title = {Datasets, Wat gezichtspunten}, year = {2018}, note = {

Presentatie voor het jaarlijks overleg collectiespecialisten Griekse Latijnse Taal en Cultuur van universiteitsbibliotheken bij Tresoar (1 november 2018)

Definitie dataset:\ 

Een dataset is een geheel van gestructureerde digitale gegevens bijeengebracht vanuit een of meer gegevensverzamelingen ten behoeve van intern of extern (her)gebruik.

Een dataset is een informatieobject van het type register.
}, month = {11/2018}, pages = {20}, abstract = {

Presentatie met een definitie en gezichtspunten rond datasets zoals\ 

}, author = {Rienk Jonker} } @article {ref_9651, title = {Archief vind je ook op straat .. .. .., Beelden, taal en voorbeelden}, year = {2013}, note = {

Presentatie bij de Provincie Frysl{\^a}n 13 juni 2013

}, month = {06/2013}, pages = {45}, address = {Leeuwarden}, abstract = {

Iedereen heeft een eigen beeld bij archief en archiefbescheiden. Het is mooi gedefinieerd, het wordt op verschillende plaatsen beschreven, het wordt op een voetstuk geplaatst en gekoesterd of juist niet. Daarom in al het geweld rond huidige ontwikkelingen, digitaal werken, werken in ketens, zaakgericht werken, social media, dienstverlening en bezuinigingen even een kleine stap terug naar de kern.\ 

An de hand van wat misschien onverwachte voorbeelden wordt een korte schets gegeven wat onder de begrippen valt en wat dat voor het vakgebied van een documentaire informatievoorziener betekent.

}, author = {Rienk Jonker} }